Forensic analysts in financial accounting have expressed worry on the observed non-disclosure of the opening and closing balances of the Fiscal Responsibility Commission (FRC) account, saying the scenario had made full appraisal of the account impossible.
In their views, the development remains a bad omen to the fight against corruption.
On Monday, a new report released by the FRC has shown that the Federal Government withdrew the sum of N359.39bn from the Excess Crude Account (ECA) in 2015 to fund the payment of petroleum products subsidy same year.
This is contrary to claims that subsidy payment and every other issues relating to subsidy had been rested by the government within the period.
Besides, the withdrawal of N359.39bn to fund subsidy on petroleum products was illegal because it contravened the purpose for which the ECA was set up.
Government had earlier within the period, withdrawn N98.19bn from the ECA to share among the three tiers of government after satisfying the condition stipulated for withdrawing money from the account.
The report said the total remittance into the ECA in 2015 amounted to only N48.94bn compared to N796.7bn paid into the account in 2014.
The FRC report said in parts: “The ECA was created as a stabilisation and savings fund to augment budgets, mainly on account of the volatility of the international oil market. The account is, therefore, funded with proceeds accruing from oil revenues in excess of the oil benchmark price as approved in the Medium-Term Expenditure Framework and budget”.
“The sum of N458.14bn was withdrawn from the ECA in 2015 compared with N927.33bn withdrawn in 2014. Other than the distribution of N98.19bn shared among the tiers of government, the withdrawal of N359.39bn for the payment of petroleum products subsidy was in violation of Section 35 of the FRA 2007. Such payment was clearly outside the scope of the ECA.
“It is worth mentioning that this is the first time since 2008/2009 when the ECA was utilised for the purpose it is meant for. The oil slump, which started in the second half of 2014, resulted in international oil price falling below the benchmark price continuously more than the three months stipulated as the primary condition for withdrawal from the ECA to augment the budget.”
“The operation and management of the ECA over the years has been in breach of the FRA 2007, the consequence of which is the difficulty in the implementation of budgets across the three tiers of government with the continued sharp drop in oil revenue.
“The discipline to manage the ECA with prudence was clearly abused. The actual balance in the ECA has become contentious, especially as this has never been disclosed in the budget implementation reports despite repeated suggestions for this to be done.”
